Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://archives.univ-biskra.dz/handle/123456789/2387Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | A. Cheriet | - |
| dc.contributor.author | A. Zaoui | - |
| dc.contributor.author | M. Feliachi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | S. M. Mimoune | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-20T22:54:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-04-20T22:54:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-04-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://archives.univ-biskra.dz/handle/123456789/2387 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The present paper deals with the comparison of the computational performance between the finite volume FVM and the finite element FEM methods. Under the same mesh size, a practical 3D magnetostatic problem proposed by IEEJ has been resolved. Detailed discretization and computational data are provided. Compared to FEM, finite volume method has the advantage to reach the solution with reduced number of iterations and CPU time. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | finite volume method, finite element method, 3D magnetostatic. | en_US |
| dc.title | COMPUTATIONAL PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN FVM AND FEM FOR 3D MAGNETOSTATIC PROBLEMS | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Communications Internationales | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ci 16 Cheriet .pdf | 197,3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.