Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://archives.univ-biskra.dz/handle/123456789/21641
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorصفاء, مالكي-
dc.contributor.authorايناس, مجيدي-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T09:11:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-29T09:11:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://archives.univ-biskra.dz/handle/123456789/21641-
dc.description.abstractThrough our study, we conclude that the administrative judge’s control over administrative decisions is considered an indispensable activity until the administration acquires the character of legitimacy in its activities. administrative decision. Hence the importance of the judiciary’s control over the activities of the administration, as it aims to protect the administration in the first place so that it does not arbitrarily in its decisions and spare it from entering into unnecessary disputes and also give the administration credibility for what it takes as it seeks to achieve the public interest in response to the requirements of life, and secondly to protect individuals.en_US
dc.language.isoaren_US
dc.titleأوجه الطعن ضد القرار الإداري وتطبيقاتها القضائيةen_US
dc.typeMasteren_US
Appears in Collections:Faculté de Droit et des Sciences Politiques (FDSP)



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.